France defends right to nuclear reply to terrorism

Tout et n'importe quoi

Modérateur : Pimp Modérateurs

Répondre
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Frank
Uber Ultimate Guru
Messages : 1595
Inscription : mer. août 17, 2005 9:58 am
Localisation : In the same reality than yours...

France defends right to nuclear reply to terrorism

Message par Frank »

BREST, France (Reuters) - France said on Thursday it would be ready to use nuclear weapons against any state that carried out a terrorist attack against it, reaffirming the need for its nuclear deterrent.

Deflecting criticism of France's costly nuclear arms program,
President Jacques Chirac said security came at a price and France must be able to hit back hard at a hostile state's centers of power and its "capacity to act."

He said there was no change in France's overall policy, which rules out the use of nuclear weapons in a military conflict. But his speech pointed to a change of emphasis to underline the growing threat France perceives from terrorism.

"The leaders of states who would use terrorist means against us, as well as those who would consider using in one way or another weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would lay themselves open to a firm and adapted response on our part," Chirac said during a visit to a nuclear submarine base in northwestern France.

"This response could be a conventional one. It could also be of a different kind."

Chirac, who is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, said all of France's nuclear forces had been configured with the new strategy in mind and the number of nuclear warheads on French nuclear submarines had been reduced to allow targeted strikes.

It was the first time he had so clearly linked the threat of a nuclear response to a terrorist attack.

Chirac, 73, did not say whether France would be prepared to use pre-emptive strikes against a country it saw as a threat.

SECURITY TIGHT

France has had nuclear weapons since the 1960s and experts believe it has some 300 nuclear warheads.

"Against a regional power, our choice would not be between inaction or annihilation," Chirac said in his first major speech on France's nuclear arms strategy since 2001.

"The flexibility and reactivity of our strategic forces would enable us to exercise our response directly against its centers of power and its capacity to act."

France has tightened security since Islamist suicide bombers killed more than 50 people in attacks on London transport last July, and following the Madrid bomb blasts which killed more than 190 people in March 2004.

Despite its strong opposition to the U.S.-led war in
Iraq, France remains a target for Islamist militants because of its intelligence links with the United States and Britain.

Last July, national police service chief Michel Gaudin said a radical Algerian Islamist group, the GSPC, had been in contact with al Qaeda's leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, about launching attacks in France.

Since the end of the Cold War, questions have been raised about the usefulness of the nuclear program, which makes up some 10 percent of the overall defense budget.

Chirac's government is under pressure to cut spending as it struggles to bring its public deficit below the
European Union's deficit limit of 3 percent of gross domestic product.

"Our country's security and its independence have their price," Chirac said.

Source: Yahoo News


---------------------------------------


Eeee... did I miss an episode? Since when Frenchies are doin' something?
Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment.
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Mike
Bastard Admin from Hell
Messages : 1255
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 1:31 pm
Localisation : Mourial
Contact :

Message par Mike »

Nukon le Moyen-Orient, yen aura pu de problème, pu d'arabe, pu de palestinien, pu de terroriste, pu d'israéliens. On va avoir la PA' :lol:
Fear me more for I am root.
Avatar de l’utilisateur
pwel
Crazy Admin from Hell!
Messages : 5422
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 1:40 pm
Localisation : Somewhere between Helsinki and San Diego

Message par pwel »

On va manquer de petrole si on fait toute sauter...c'est le seul point négatif
Un geek c'est quelqu'un qui pense que dans 1km il y a 1024m!
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Mike
Bastard Admin from Hell
Messages : 1255
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 1:31 pm
Localisation : Mourial
Contact :

Message par Mike »

Ya moyen de viser les zone de population et d'épargner le gros des champs petrolifere. Je suis sur que les states y ont deja pensé.
Fear me more for I am root.
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Doum
Hippie King
Messages : 963
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 6:41 pm
Localisation : Ma chaise en générale

Message par Doum »

vous avez oublié lé noir... on va faire quoi avec l'afrique?
Doum

Don't take life too seriously nobody ever gets out alive.
It is not because you know how it's gonna end that you can't enjoy the ride
Simon
Geek
Messages : 252
Inscription : ven. sept. 16, 2005 7:57 pm
Localisation : Sherbybrooke

Message par Simon »

Les laissez-mourrir de faim? A non c'est vrai ça on le fait déja
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Doum
Hippie King
Messages : 963
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 6:41 pm
Localisation : Ma chaise en générale

Message par Doum »

mouahahaahha bon vla lhippy qui parle :P
Doum

Don't take life too seriously nobody ever gets out alive.
It is not because you know how it's gonna end that you can't enjoy the ride
Simon
Geek
Messages : 252
Inscription : ven. sept. 16, 2005 7:57 pm
Localisation : Sherbybrooke

Message par Simon »

Hahhahha :lol:
Avatar de l’utilisateur
pwel
Crazy Admin from Hell!
Messages : 5422
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 1:40 pm
Localisation : Somewhere between Helsinki and San Diego

Message par pwel »

Dans le fond ca serait bin mieux les armes chimiques...ca tue le monde sans rien decalisser...apres ca on s'empare des puits de pétrole pi toute...
Un geek c'est quelqu'un qui pense que dans 1km il y a 1024m!
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Frank
Uber Ultimate Guru
Messages : 1595
Inscription : mer. août 17, 2005 9:58 am
Localisation : In the same reality than yours...

Message par Frank »

lol je m'attendais pas à ce que la thread prenne cette direction!

C'est... inspirant ;)
Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment.
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Mike
Bastard Admin from Hell
Messages : 1255
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 1:31 pm
Localisation : Mourial
Contact :

Message par Mike »

Pwel a écrit :Dans le fond ca serait bin mieux les armes chimiques...ca tue le monde sans rien decalisser...apres ca on s'empare des puits de pétrole pi toute...
Le reve de la guerre propre!



Propre dans le sens qu'on peut récuperer les infrastructures en place. Mais la plus grande partie du boost économique relié à une guerre vient de l'effort de reconstruction...
Fear me more for I am root.
Simon
Geek
Messages : 252
Inscription : ven. sept. 16, 2005 7:57 pm
Localisation : Sherbybrooke

Message par Simon »

Détruire pour reconstruire, toujours utile :?
Avatar de l’utilisateur
Doum
Hippie King
Messages : 963
Inscription : mar. août 16, 2005 6:41 pm
Localisation : Ma chaise en générale

Message par Doum »

oua sa créé.. de lemploi...
Doum

Don't take life too seriously nobody ever gets out alive.
It is not because you know how it's gonna end that you can't enjoy the ride
Répondre